Heneghan v Manchester Dry Docks Ltd & Others

11 Dec 2014

In a successful BLM asbestos-related lung cancer case, the High Court has today held that where the claimant has been exposed to asbestos in breach of duty by more than one defendant, and no defendant is responsible for more than half the total cumulative exposure, damages should be apportioned in line with the relative share of exposure. Damages in asbestos-related lung cancer cases are divisible.

The deceased died from asbestos-related lung cancer in January 2013. He was exposed to asbestos by ten employers. Of these, six were sued by the claimant. The deceased worked for these six (the defendants) between 1961 and 1974. Asbestos exposure with the defendants accounted for 35.2% of the deceased’s total asbestos exposure. Liability was admitted. If the defendants were liable in full, damages totalled £175,000. 35.2% of damages equalled £61,600. The sole issue for the High Court was whether the defendants were liable for damages in full (as the claimant argued), or in proportion to their 32.5% share of exposure (as the defendants submitted).

As Jay J observed, this issue has not been dealt with by previous authority.

Click here for further details.

<< Back

Disclaimer: This document does not present a complete or comprehensive statement of the law, nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight issues that may be of interest to customers of BLM. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in any particular case.

Related Expertise


Related Sectors


Related contacts


Nick Pargeter

Nick Pargeter

Partner and head of occupational disease practice group,
London


Who to contact


For more information about any of our news releases, please contact:

Natalie King
 +44 20 7638 2811
+44 20 7920 0361
Email Natalie

Fi Khan
+44 161 236 2002
+44 161 838 6324
Email Fi

|